Blogging on User Interface and experience

Haven’t written for a long while, working on my stelth startup, soon to be luanched! So for now I give you something I got about mathematical reasoning: This comes from 2 math teachers with a combined total of 70 yrs. Experience. Here is a little something someone sent me that is indisputable mathematical logic. It also made me Laugh Out Loud. This is a strictly mathematical viewpoint…it goes like this: What Makes 100%? What does it mean to give MORE than 100%? Ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%? We have all been to those meetings where someone wants you to give over 100%. How about achieving 103%? What makes up 100% in life? Here’s a little mathematical formula that might help you answer these questions: If: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Is represented as: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26. Then: H-A-R-D-W-O-R-K 8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98% And K-N-O-W-L-E-D-G-E 11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96% But , A-T-T-I-T-U-D-E 1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100% And, B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T 2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103% AND, look how far ass kissing will take you. A-S-S-K-I-S-S-I-N-G 1+19+19+11+9+19+19+9+14+7 = 118% So, one can conclude with mathematical certainty, that While Hard work and Knowledge will get you close, and Attitude will get you there, its the Bullshit and Ass kissing that will put you over the top.

We have 5 diggers for the diggable posts.
I know I’m a digger, and Danny is a digger too.
Who are the mysterious three?
Are digging phantoms of the net?
For you I write this haiku post.

Might be interesting to some of you: Third International Conference on Design Principles and Practices
Berlin, Germany 15-17 February 2009
See@: http://www.Design-Conference.com

P.S. Don’t digg me

Yahoo! Design Stencil Kit version 1.0 is available for OmniGraffle, Visio (XML), Adobe Illustrator (PDF and SVG), and Adobe Photoshop (PNG), Been checking it out, looks great for any UI designer.
Get it here!

Google friend connect is all about making the user life easy, you can join any web site with your Google account, and any web site can have ready made social elements, like friends (subscribers) and comments.

The basic flow of the service is:
I want to accomplish a goal-> I see I can on a site-> I choose to register -> I am redirected to Google accounts-> I login (one click action) -> I share with friends -> I set settings -> I get back to the site to complete my task.

Google engineers have forgot some basic rules of web usability:

1. Most people have a goal in mind when entering a web site, Help people perform that goal as fast and as easy as possible.
Instead of one click registration to the site users are asked to take a long road to complete their goals with sharing, entering details and getting settings organized. If a user just wants to add a comment, this can be way to much for him.

2. Keep users within the context of their goal environment.
In order to register to a site, users are redirected to Google accounts. The originating site design is not kept as the interaction. Users can get easily confused and irritated by the sadden change of context. This problem can go away with time if usage of Google connect becomes frequent and users expect it to happen, but until then…
On the other hand, how hard was it to accomplish login within the original site environment, something like a widget box that they have there anyway.

Waiting to see facebook connect…

User interface and user experience practitioners have a new blogs aggregator in town:

UI.altop.com

Altop.com (by Guy Kawasaki) is a "by topic" aggregator and they just opened the UI/UX topic page for the messes. The page follows most of the leading UI/UX blogs and in a clean and simple design.
What I miss in this page is the podcasts and videos follow up, but I believe it will follow shortly.

I follow my RSS feeds on Google reader. I like it for the basic simplicity of it and for the complicated options it enables me to follow.

Today I got a first look of what a “share item with note” looks like:

As you can see - the Image is very small and not really clear.

So, I thought it’s me…

I tried going for the extended view (I use the list view):

What did Google do wrong?

Google enabled users to share an item (was able before) and add a personal aspect to it (note).
Google transferred a social element - Identity (a picture that represent me), that is very common on social websites and implemented it poorly.
A common method for creating user interfaces is copy the familiar.
In order to create a feel of familiarity UI practitioners copy from real life, or from digital elements that most users known before or still using.

So Google wants to become a social network, but why represent it with a 10 pixels on 10 pixels picture?

Lately I have been hooked on twitter- a service for micro blogging, and there is a lot of buzz about it nowadays.
The twitter personal page looks like a good example for simplicity, and the main content section is just that.

A Twitter profile has a very simple (first impression) interface:
There is the noticeable Logo, a big question "what are you doing?" and a big text box.
Below you see "twitts" of people I am following. Delicate tabs show the user the ways of interaction.

However, The rest of the page is not understandable at first - what are device updates? what are followers? what are following? what is the difference between them (facebook and such social networks require interaction to be two way).

Continue reading →

This year the CHI2008 event was in Florence, Italy. This was my first time in CHI and in Florence. Both interesting, but for me looking backwards now CHI was much more of an attraction. I was amazed by size of the event, so many UI experts in one place, how comes there are still UI problems out there? Continue reading →

Recently I got a look at this manual from apple - has a lot of good guidelines from the company that is known for its user experience.

Enjoy

A Name is an identity one can relate to, respond to, feel empathy to, and have a dialog with.
Web sites have been using their users names in numerous ways to increase their activity’s and emotional relation to their service.
Some of those ways:

• create an emotional connection and empathy.
• Increase user activity and involvement in activities.
• Ownership of information by a specific user within the service.
• Dialog between users.
• CRM - Get the user back to the service using email messages.

Continue reading →